search

Mikail Alimli vs Stijn Pel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Alimli vs Pel analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?

After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:

* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here

If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com  Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.

Mikail Alimli vs Stijn Pel Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Alimli 1 - 0 Pel

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Alimli has won 48.4% of points on their second serve, while Pel has won 48.45%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Alimli, in recent form, has won 51.96% of their opponent's second serve points, while Pel has won 45.91%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.03% and 28.75% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Alimli has saved 56.1% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pel has saved 60.5% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Alimli has won 52.38% of matches played (W/L 22/ 20), with Pel winning 53.06% (W/L 26/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Alimli has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 26/ 25), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 24/ 39). Pel has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 28/ 23), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 6/ 6).
  • Player level: In the last year, Alimli has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 52.5% of matches (W/L 21/ 19), where as Pel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 53.06% of matches (W/L 26/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Alimli winning 1 times and Pel being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Alimli winning 2 and Pel winning 1. The last match between Alimli and Pel was at the M15 Alkmaar, 26-06-2024, First, Clay with Mikail Alimli getting the victory 5-7 6-0 6-4.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:49:0.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Alimli and Pel have played a deciding set 1 times, with Alimli winning 1 times and Pel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Alimli winning 0, and Pel 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Alimli has played against opponents with an average rank of 82.31 while Pel has played against players with an average rank of 60.39.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Alimli has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pel has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Alimli has converted 38.81% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pel has converted 32.41% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
bet365
Mikail Alimli

0

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

0

Minor

N/A

Rank

High

20

Age

Plays

1

Total

0

0

Hard

0

1

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

N/A

Rank

High

22

Age

Plays

Stijn Pel

0

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

0

Minor

1

Total

0

0

Hard

0

1

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

W L W L L W W L W L

Form

W L L L L L W L L L

45% (59-72)

Career Total W/L

54% (58-49)

54% (13-11)

YTD W/L

35% (6-11)

$0

Career Prize Money

$0

0

YTD Titles

0

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

The Best Odds For Mikail Alimli vs Stijn Pel For Any Market:

We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:

Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Alimli VS Pel

Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!

Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting

Alimli VS Pel H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

stats Mikail Alimli Stijn Pel
All H2H Matches 1 0
Sets Won 2 1
Games Won 17 11
Aces (Total) 6 4
DFs Total 8 11
Avg Match Time 2:49:0 2:49:0
1st Serve % 52% (48/92) 47% (50/106)
1st Serve Win% 83% (40/48) 66% (33/50)
2nd Serve Win% 52% (23/44) 45% (25/56)
BPs Won% (Total) 38% (5/13) 17% (2/12)
Return Points W% 45% (48/106) 32% (29/92)
Best of 3 Sets W% 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win% 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
1st set W, W 0% (0/0) 0% (1/0)
1st set W, L 0% (0/0) 100% (1/1)
1st set L, W 100% (1/1) 0% (0/0)

Alimli VS Pel H2h Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
5-7 6-0 6-4
cross
Mikail Alimli
Player
Stijn Pel
52% ( 48 of 92)
1st Serve %
47% ( 50 of 106)
6
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
11
83% ( 40 of 48)
1st Serve Won
66% ( 33 of 50)
52% ( 23 of 44)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 25 of 56)
38% ( 5 of 13)
Break Points Won
17% ( 2 of 12)
32% ( 29 of 92)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 48 of 106)
111
Total Points Won
87

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats Mikail Alimli Stijn Pel
YTD W/L 54% (13/11) 35% (6/11)
Sets Win/Loss 53% (27/24) 42% (15/21)
Games Win/Loss 50% (231/228) 47% (162/186)
Hard Win/Loss 0% (0/1) 0% (0/2)
Clay Win/Loss 54% (7/6) 17% (1/5)
Indoor Hard W/L 60% (6/4) 56% (5/4)
Grass Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Aces pg 0.4 0.42
Aces Total 89 71
DFs per game 0.25 0.25
DFs Total 55 42
Avg Match Time 1:23:50 1:37:52
Avg Opp Rank 68.46 139.29
1st Serve % 53% (695/1319) 62% (696/1115)
1st Serve W% 71% (496/695) 66% (457/696)
2nd Serve W% 48% (302/624) 48% (203/419)
BPs Won% Total 39% (52/134) 32% (35/108)
Return Pts W% 40% (508/1275) 36% (382/1066)
Slam W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Masters W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Cups W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Futures W/L 54% (13/11) 35% (6/11)
Best of 3 Sets W% 57% (13/23) 38% (6/16)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 67% (2/3) 33% (1/3)
Deciding Set W% 75% (3/4) 0% (0/3)
1st set W, W 92% (12/11) 75% (8/6)
1st set W, L 8% (12/1) 25% (8/2)
1st set L, W 17% (12/2) 0% (9/0)

Mikail Alimli Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
R2
cross
Deney Wassermann
Player
Mikail Alimli
47% ( 28 of 59)
1st Serve %
54% ( 29 of 54)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
71% ( 20 of 28)
1st Serve Won
59% ( 17 of 29)
61% ( 19 of 31)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 11 of 25)
44% ( 4 of 9)
Break Points Won
20% ( 1 of 5)
34% ( 20 of 59)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 26 of 54)
65
Total Points Won
48
L
6-1 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Mikail Alimli
Player
Stijn Pel
52% ( 48 of 92)
1st Serve %
47% ( 50 of 106)
6
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
11
83% ( 40 of 48)
1st Serve Won
66% ( 33 of 50)
52% ( 23 of 44)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 25 of 56)
38% ( 5 of 13)
Break Points Won
17% ( 2 of 12)
32% ( 29 of 92)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 48 of 106)
111
Total Points Won
87
W
5-7 6-0 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Corentin Denolly
Player
Mikail Alimli
75% ( 30 of 40)
1st Serve %
48% ( 30 of 63)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
83% ( 25 of 30)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 21 of 30)
70% ( 7 of 10)
2nd Serve Won
33% ( 11 of 33)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
20% ( 8 of 40)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 31 of 63)
63
Total Points Won
40
L
6-0 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Mikail Alimli
Player
Ignasi Forcano
62% ( 31 of 50)
1st Serve %
70% ( 39 of 56)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
84% ( 26 of 31)
1st Serve Won
62% ( 24 of 39)
63% ( 12 of 19)
2nd Serve Won
53% ( 9 of 17)
75% ( 3 of 4)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
24% ( 12 of 50)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 23 of 56)
61
Total Points Won
45
W
6-4 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
Mikail Alimli
Player
Niccolo Festini Mira
63% ( 31 of 49)
1st Serve %
47% ( 17 of 36)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
71% ( 22 of 31)
1st Serve Won
53% ( 9 of 17)
72% ( 13 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 8 of 19)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 3)
29% ( 14 of 49)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 19 of 36)
54
Total Points Won
31
W
6-0 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Lucas Bouquet
Player
Mikail Alimli
81% ( 22 of 27)
1st Serve %
48% ( 13 of 27)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
91% ( 20 of 22)
1st Serve Won
15% ( 2 of 13)
80% ( 4 of 5)
2nd Serve Won
7% ( 1 of 14)
100% ( 6 of 6)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
11% ( 3 of 27)
Rtn Points Won
89% ( 24 of 27)
48
Total Points Won
6
L
6-0 6-0 H2H
QF
cross
Jeiden Saidizand
Player
Mikail Alimli
53% ( 29 of 55)
1st Serve %
61% ( 38 of 62)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
72% ( 21 of 29)
1st Serve Won
47% ( 18 of 38)
54% ( 14 of 26)
2nd Serve Won
46% ( 11 of 24)
45% ( 5 of 11)
Break Points Won
17% ( 1 of 6)
36% ( 20 of 55)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 33 of 62)
68
Total Points Won
49
L
6-3 6-2 H2H
Q1
W
6-1 6-4 H2H
R2
cross
Lucas Catarina
Player
Mikail Alimli
57% ( 31 of 54)
1st Serve %
53% ( 27 of 51)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
77% ( 24 of 31)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 17 of 27)
61% ( 14 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 10 of 24)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 4)
30% ( 16 of 54)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 24 of 51)
62
Total Points Won
43
L
6-2 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Mikail Alimli
Player
Filip Gustafsson
64% ( 39 of 61)
1st Serve %
64% ( 28 of 44)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
64% ( 25 of 39)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 17 of 28)
68% ( 15 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
19% ( 3 of 16)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
20% ( 1 of 5)
34% ( 21 of 61)
Rtn Points Won
55% ( 24 of 44)
64
Total Points Won
41
W
6-1 6-4 H2H

Stijn Pel Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
R1
cross
Mikail Alimli
Player
Stijn Pel
52% ( 48 of 92)
1st Serve %
47% ( 50 of 106)
6
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
11
83% ( 40 of 48)
1st Serve Won
66% ( 33 of 50)
52% ( 23 of 44)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 25 of 56)
38% ( 5 of 13)
Break Points Won
17% ( 2 of 12)
32% ( 29 of 92)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 48 of 106)
111
Total Points Won
87
L
5-7 6-0 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Ognjen Milic
Player
Stijn Pel
45% ( 40 of 89)
1st Serve %
59% ( 55 of 93)
4
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
2
73% ( 29 of 40)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 35 of 55)
53% ( 26 of 49)
2nd Serve Won
47% ( 18 of 38)
29% ( 4 of 14)
Break Points Won
33% ( 3 of 9)
38% ( 34 of 89)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 40 of 93)
95
Total Points Won
87
L
6-1 2-6 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Jeremy Gschwendtner
Player
Stijn Pel
58% ( 33 of 57)
1st Serve %
63% ( 40 of 63)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
67% ( 22 of 33)
1st Serve Won
48% ( 19 of 40)
54% ( 13 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 10 of 23)
38% ( 6 of 16)
Break Points Won
100% ( 3 of 3)
39% ( 22 of 57)
Rtn Points Won
54% ( 34 of 63)
69
Total Points Won
51
L
6-1 7-5 H2H
Q2
W
6-2 7-5 H2H
R1
cross
Alexandre Aubriot
Player
Stijn Pel
58% ( 41 of 71)
1st Serve %
69% ( 57 of 83)
2
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
2
73% ( 30 of 41)
1st Serve Won
58% ( 33 of 57)
47% ( 14 of 30)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 10 of 26)
38% ( 5 of 13)
Break Points Won
22% ( 2 of 9)
38% ( 27 of 71)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 40 of 83)
84
Total Points Won
70
L
7-5 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Noah Perfetti
Player
Stijn Pel
85% ( 53 of 62)
1st Serve %
68% ( 38 of 56)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
55% ( 29 of 53)
1st Serve Won
50% ( 19 of 38)
78% ( 7 of 9)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 8 of 18)
45% ( 5 of 11)
Break Points Won
29% ( 2 of 7)
42% ( 26 of 62)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 29 of 56)
65
Total Points Won
53
L
6-3 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Marek Gengel
Player
Stijn Pel
78% ( 36 of 46)
1st Serve %
56% ( 33 of 59)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
83% ( 30 of 36)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 20 of 33)
60% ( 6 of 10)
2nd Serve Won
46% ( 12 of 26)
100% ( 4 of 4)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
22% ( 10 of 46)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 27 of 59)
63
Total Points Won
42
L
6-4 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Daniel Little
Player
Stijn Pel
60% ( 49 of 82)
1st Serve %
56% ( 46 of 82)
3
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
82% ( 40 of 49)
1st Serve Won
83% ( 38 of 46)
64% ( 21 of 33)
2nd Serve Won
56% ( 20 of 36)
50% ( 1 of 2)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
26% ( 21 of 82)
Rtn Points Won
29% ( 24 of 82)
85
Total Points Won
79
L
7-6(6) 7-6(7) H2H
R1
cross
David Poljak
Player
Stijn Pel
60% ( 48 of 80)
1st Serve %
58% ( 50 of 86)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
73% ( 35 of 48)
1st Serve Won
62% ( 31 of 50)
53% ( 17 of 32)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 18 of 36)
50% ( 5 of 10)
Break Points Won
30% ( 3 of 10)
35% ( 28 of 80)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 37 of 86)
89
Total Points Won
77
L
4-6 6-1 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Stijn Pel
Player
Liova Ajavon
72% ( 44 of 61)
1st Serve %
73% ( 36 of 49)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
70% ( 31 of 44)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 22 of 36)
65% ( 11 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
69% ( 9 of 13)
75% ( 3 of 4)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
31% ( 19 of 61)
Rtn Points Won
37% ( 18 of 49)
60
Total Points Won
50
W
6-2 6-4 H2H

Alimli Vs Pel Prediction H2H Images To Share

More tennis photos of Alimli are available here and Pel photos here.


Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions